In the latest fascicle of ZAW Nathan MacDonald has published a response to Juha Pakkala's argument that the earliest version of the book of Deuteronomy, the Urdeuteronomium, is to be dated to the post-exilic period. MacDonald's article examines the ten reasons that Pakkala puts forward and finds each of them wanting. He concludes that the case for a post-exilic date must be judged not proven.
Publication details: ‘Issues in the Dating of Deuteronomy: A Response to Juha Pakkala’, Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 122 (2010), pp. 431–435.
Thursday, May 12, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment